Thursday, June 19, 2008

Orphanages under threat in Hebron / orphelinats menacés à Hebron







(c) Anne Paq/ Activestills.org, Hebron, 19 June 2008.


Orphanages under threat in Hebron.


In March and April 2008, the IDF raided the orphanages and buildings in Hebron run by he Islamic Charitable Society for the care of the orphanages. The Charity expanded through years to become responsible for 2 orphanages, 3 schools for boys and girls, dairy, sewing workshop, 2 bakeries, a big mall and a 30- apartment building. The equipments of two bakeries which were preparing bread for thousands of children have been destroyed or confiscated, as well as clothes for the children and computers. Some equipements have been subsequently found in the garbage dump. The Israeli military has ordered the closure of buildings rented by the Islamic Charitable Society (ICS), saying it is working for Hamas. More than 200 orphass who sleep in the facilities and thousands of children who go to the school are affected. A brand new girls’school which was supposed to provide eduction for 1200 girls and was supposed to open at the end of this summer will not open its doors. Some internationals have begun to sleep in the buildings in solidarity with the orphans. For more information see http://www.hebronorphans.blogspot.com/

En Mars et Avril 2008, l’armée israélienne a effectué des raids dan les orphelinats et les bâtiments à Hébron gérés par la Société islamique de charité qui s’occupe de nombreux orphelins. La société est responsable de 2 orphelinats, 3 écoles pour les garçons et les filles, de la productions de produits laitiers, d’atelier de couture, 2 boulangeries, un centre commercial et un immeuble d’ une trentaine d’habitation pour des familles modestes. Les équipements de deux boulangeries qui préparent chaque jour du pain pour des milliers d'enfants ont été détruits ou confisqués, ainsi que des vêtements pour les enfants et les ordinateurs. Certains équipements ont par la suite été trouvés dans la décharge publique. L'armée israélienne a ordonné la fermeture des bâtiments loués par l'Islamic Charitable Society (ICS), en disant qu'il travaille pour le Hamas. Plus de 200 orphelins qui dorment dans les installations et des milliers d’ enfants qui vont à l'école sont affectés. Une tout nouvelle école pour les filles l qui était censée assurer l'éducation de 1200 fille qui devait ouvrir à la fin de cet été ne pourra pas ouvrir ses portes.
Des internationaux ont commencé à dormir dans les bâtiments en solidarité avec les orphelins.
Pour plus d’information voir : http://www.hebronorphans.blogspot.com/



Wednesday, June 18, 2008

shame on Europe

A dubious Israeli spring in Europe
By Gideon Levy


How pleasant it is to be an official representative of Israel in Europe right now. It hasn't been so pleasant for a long time. And not just because of the spectacular spring in the Luxembourg Gardens in Paris, the crowded pubs in Athens or the young people sunbathing nude in Stockholm. This is about the fresh sympathy for Israel blowing in from almost every capital. French newspapers went all out for our 60th anniversary, Israeli women soldiers starred on the covers of magazines, and even the Swedish papers lost a little of their interest in the Palestinians' suffering, which had for years won such deep sympathy.

Last week, when the Olof Palme International Center in Stockholm held a symposium on peace in the Middle East, a scandal broke out because the organizers dared invite a professor of Islamic studies, Azam Tamimi, a Hamas sympathizer from London. Even in Sweden. This sympathy for Israel, along with seething antipathy for Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims, includes, of course, active European participation in the boycott of Gaza and Hamas, which may reach new heights this week. The Council of Foreign Ministers of the European Union is slated tomorrow to discuss upgrading Israel's standing in the EU, and later in the week ministers of the EU member states will also do so. It only takes opposition by one country to prevent the upgrade of ties, which would have significant economic ramifications for Israel.

But there is a good chance that exactly as Europe decided unanimously to boycott Gaza, it will say yes to an upgrade of Israel's ties with the EU. For official Israel, this is excellent news. Perhaps for the first time, a very strange set of circumstances prevails: Europe, which holds high the standard of human rights and liberty, is boycotting the occupied entity. As if that were not enough, it is even upgrading its ties with the occupier. While Europe is perceived by most Israelis as hostile to Israel, not to say anti-Semitic, its governments are uniting to support Israel almost no matter what it does.

Europe's blind obedience to the United States, which led it into Afghanistan and Iraq, combined with guilt over the Holocaust, is manifest in its relationship toward us. Xenophobia, and particularly hatred of Muslims, Hamas' rise in Gaza and that organization's perception in Europe as part of a dangerous Islamic conspiracy whose other members are Al-Qaida and Hezbollah, are now also finding expression in the relationship to Israel.

It is true that Israel's representatives continue to complain bitterly about hostility. Israel's envoy to London last week lamented that Britain had become a hotbed of radical anti-Israel views; it always pays to complain. It is also true that public opinion in Europe is still more sympathetic to the Palestinians. But the European governments are turning their backs on this sentiment and are conducting a quite amazingly sympathetic policy toward Israel. There is practically no country that has not sent an official to Israel recently; they are all rushing to Sderot to take their picture with a Qassam, and staying away from Gaza in droves, despite the much greater suffering there.

This false magic charm should not be allowed to trick us. This is not good news for those who wish for an end to the Israeli occupation and still believe that Europe can and should play a useful role in achieving peace in the region. Europe, which is now incomprehensibly and blindly following the U.S., is not just a Europe ignoring the values it proclaims; it is also a Europe that will lose any possibility to influence the region. That is not good for the Middle East and it is bad for Europe, too, in whose backyard our conflict begins.

We already have a one-sided mediator of the type that gives Israel free rein to follow every whim of its occupation: America. We have no need for another. Europe's special status - as Israel's major economic market that maintains an extensive network of relations with the Arab world as well - is eroding. Instead we are getting a West that no longer makes demands on Israel, comes to terms with the criminal occupation and is heavy-handed only when it comes to the Palestinians. True, Europe is also the biggest donor to the Palestinian Authority, but in so doing it subsidizes the occupation, nothing more.

When PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, the darling of Israel and the U.S., dared recently to work against the upgrade, Israel quickly hit the PA in its pocketbook and confiscated the tax money belonging to it; a scandal in itself. Thus will be done to the man who tries to demand that Europe maintain some measure of balance.

Europe must come to its senses this week. It must condition the upgrade of relations with Israel on a series of practical steps Israel must take, in the spirit of its declared values. Want an upgrade? Please conduct yourselves according to international law, please respect the most basic human rights, please lift the siege on Gaza. That is how the EU behaves toward the rest of the countries knocking at its door. An unconditional upgrade will be a prize for settlements, a medal for siege, closures and starvation. Is that the way Europe wants to see itself? Lavishing gifts on the occupier, boycotting the occupied, and becoming an American puppet?
/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=992688

In the meantime, in the Tel Aviv bubble.../ Pendant ce temps, dans la bulle de tel aviv







(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org, Tel Aviv, 16 June 2008.

Photo exhibition by young refugees in Tel Aviv



ActiveVision inviting:

Asylum city street exhibition



Young refugees from Sudan telling about

their life through photography



20.6.08 Friday 15:00-18:00



The public garden of Shapira neighborhood



At the Corner of Baal Haakeda St' and Arye De Morina St'

Near by the New central station , Tel Aviv.



www.activestills.org\activevision

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Une diplomate française retenue dix-sept heures au passage d'Erez

Une diplomate française retenue dix-sept heures au passage d'Erez
LE MONDE | 17.06.08 | 14h54 • Mis à jour le 17.06.08 | 14h54
JÉRUSALEM CORRESPONDANT

ranchir le point de passage d'Erez, au nord de la bande de Gaza, pour pénétrer en Israël est rarement une chose simple. Les contrôles sont tatillons, l'attente interminable et le cheminement incommode dans les différents sas. Mercredi 11 juin, une diplomate française, Catherine Hyver, consul adjointe de France à Jérusalem, ainsi qu'un agent de sécurité de la représentation française l'ont expérimenté. En pire. Pendant dix-sept heures, du mercredi à 16 h 30 au jeudi matin 9 h 30, ces deux personnes disposant d'un passeport diplomatique ont été retenues dans les locaux de ce terminal, sans boire ni manger, parce qu'elles ont refusé, comme l'autorisent les pratiques diplomatiques internationales, que leur véhicule, doté de la plaque diplomatique, soit fouillé.

Au départ, cinq personnes se trouvaient à bord du véhicule diplomatique. Dont un photographe qui eut la malencontreuse idée de laisser son matériel dans la voiture avant d'emprunter la file de contrôle réservée aux non-diplomates. Les agents diplomatiques ayant affirmé que tout ce qui se trouvait à bord de leur voiture leur appartenait, y compris l'équipement du photographe, ils furent immédiatement accusés par les responsables de la sécurité d'être "des menteurs". Ceux-ci exigèrent alors une fouille complète du véhicule bien que le matériel du photographe ait pu être examiné de fond en comble. La fouille étant contraire aux usages diplomatiques et notamment à la convention consulaire de Vienne de 1963, Mme Hyver s'y est opposée.

Rien n'y a fait. Pas plus les interventions de l'ambassade de France à Tel-Aviv, du consulat général à Jérusalem, du ministère israélien de la défense. Les diplomates ont proposé de sortir tous les bagages. Ce n'était pas suffisant. Un responsable du Shin Bet (sécurité intérieure) n'a cessé d'invectiver les deux diplomates. Les trois compagnons des deux "naufragés d'Erez" ont quant à eux pu finalement franchir la frontière. Vers 23 heures, le terminal a fermé ses portes. Le personnel est parti, laissant les deux diplomates assis sur des chaises en plastique dans un hall puissamment éclairé, sans une goutte d'eau, ni une miette de pain, avec les moustiques pour seuls compagnons. A leur demande, des soldats les ont accompagnés aux toilettes. A 7 heures du matin, après une nuit sans sommeil, il a fallu parlementer longuement avec la nouvelle équipe pour pouvoir accéder à la machine à café. Voyant que la sécurité israélienne n'était pas prête à céder, que la tension montait, Mme Hyver et son compagnon d'infortune ont fini par céder. La voiture fut entièrement vidée, le contenu passé aux rayons X, y compris le courrier diplomatique.

UNE VIOLATION DES CONVENTIONS

Selon les conventions de Vienne qui réglementent les usages diplomatiques et consulaires, les voitures sont assimilées à des locaux et sont donc inviolables. Mais depuis le début de l'année, les Israéliens ont, plusieurs fois, passé outre ces mesures de protection diplomatique. Le consul général de France, Alain Rémy, a ainsi été retenu pendant plus de trois heures, le 25 janvier, au check-point de Bethléem après avoir, lui aussi, refusé d'ouvrir le coffre de la camionnette qui le suivait et transportait des cadeaux de Noël pour des religieuses.

La même mésaventure est arrivée au Père Charles-Eugène Galichet qui, ayant oublié son passeport de service, a été, pendant six heures, empêché de franchir le même check-point puis conduit au commissariat pour un interrogatoire. Enfin, depuis le 28 janvier, le bus scolaire portant une plaque consulaire qui transporte la quinzaine d'élèves palestiniens de Bethléem vers le lycée français de Jérusalem ne peut franchir le même point de passage s'il n'y a pas un diplomate à bord. Sinon, la fouille des cartables est de rigueur. Toutes les protestations et les notes verbales sont restées jusqu'à présent sans effet.

The protest boat for gaza did not leave the shore / Le bateau pour manifester en solidarité avec Gaza n'a pas quiité la rive







(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org, Herzliya, 16 June 2008

On the morning of the 16/6/2008 peace activists intended to sail with a boat from the marina of Herzliya, as a solidarity action with the fishermen in Gaza strip who held at the same time a protest against the ongoing siege on the sea of Gaza.
The sail was canceled at the last minute, after the captain of the rented boat refused to let activists with Palestinian flags to go on boat.The Palestinians flags were only visible on the symbol of Gush Shalom which organised the event and whose symbol is constituted by a circle which contains the Palestinian and the Israeli flag side by side.


Le matin du 16/6/2008 des militants pour la paix ont organisé d'aller en mer avec un bateau à partir de la marina de Hertzliya, comme action de solidarité avec les pêcheurs de la bande de Gaza qui ont tenu en même temps une protestation contre le siège en cours sur la mer de Gaza.
La navigation a été annulée à la dernière minute, car le capitaine du bateau loué refusé de laisser les militants monter à bord avec des drapeaux palestiniens. Les drapeaux palestiniens etaient mis à côté du drapeau israelien, puisqu'il s'agit du signhe de Gush Shalo, l'organisation qui avait planifié cette action.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Military invasion of Deheishe refugee camp / Invasion militaire du camp de réfugiés de Deheishe







(c) Anne Paq /Activestills.org, 14 June 2008

see text below

Military invasion of Deheishe refugee camp / Invasion militaire du camp de réfugiés de Deheishe







(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org, 14 June 2008.

On 14 June 2008, the Israeli army invaded Deheishe refugee camp looking for Mohad Abu Haker a 17 years old wanted Palestinian. The clashes with the Palestinians from Deheishe have lasted several hours. The soldiers use rubber coated bullets and tear gas. Around 10 Palestinians were moderatly injured. The soldiers went to the flat of the wanted Palestinian and destroyed most furnitures and cause many damages. The family was kept in a military jeep and was threatened. This destruction of property constitute an act of collective punishment which is forbidden by international law.

Le 14 Juin 2008, l'armée israélienne a envahi le camp de réfugiés de Deheishe à la recherche de Mohad Abu Haker un Palestinien recherché âgé de17 ans. Les affrontements avec les Palestiniens de Deheishe ont duré plusieurs heures. Les soldats on utilisé des balles enrobées de caoutchouc et des gaz lacrymogènes. Environ 10 Palestiniens ont été blessés. Les soldats sont allés à l'appartement du Palestinien recherché et ont détruit la plupart des meubles et causé de nombreux dommages. La famille a été maintenue dans une jeep militaire et a été menacée d’arrestation si Mohad ne se constitue pas prisonnier. Cette destruction des biens constituent un acte de châtiment collectif qui est interdit par le droit international.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Demonstration in Bi'lin / Manifestation à Bil'in





(c) Anne Paq/ Activestills.org. Bil'in, Friday 13 June.

A new demonstration in Bi’lin. It has been more than three years now that the people of Bil’in have been organising a weekly demonstration against the construction of the Wall. At every demonstration; the Israeli soldiers use disproportionnate force, including live bullets.
This week was no exception. We were around 100 Palestinians, Israelis and internationals and we were walking towards the Wall. After just a few minutes the soldiers sent scores of tear gas. The air was horrible. Still some Palestinians continued to walk towards the Wall. They were met by more tear gas. Then some began to throw stones, some really illusatory weapons against bullets and well-protected soldiers. A certain energy of despair. Soon the soldiers began also to use rubber bullets. After around one hour and an half, it seemed to be over and we decided to all leave. But it was not over. A few Palestinians stayed. Then in the evening I heard with horror that Ibrahim, one of the Palestinian, was badly injured by live bullets. The Israeli soldiers waited that everybody was away, especially the photographers. One Palestinian filmed and a short horrific video is on youtube, but for sure it is not going to be shown somewhere else.


Une nouvelle manifestation à Bi’lin. Voilà plus de trois ans que cela dure, tous les vendredis des Palestiniens, Israéliens et internationaux manifestent contre la construction du Mur. Ils rencontrent inévitablement la violence des soldats israéliens. Cela faisait bien longtemps que je n’y étais pas allée et je m’attendais au pire. Un vendredi 13 en plus. Nous étions environ une centaine. Nous avons coupé à travers les arbres afin de rejoindre le Mur. Mais les soldats israéliens nous ont tout de suite bombardé de gaz lacrymogène. L’air est devenu insupportable. Pourtant des Palestiniens ont continué à avancer et à braver les soldats. Les pierres ont commencé à être lancées, armes illusoires face à des balles et des soldats ultra protégés. Une certaine énergie du désespoir. J’ai observé la scène de loin, il y a des jours comme ça. Les soldats ont aussi commencé à tirer des balles en caoutchouc. Apres une heure trente, nous sommes partis. Mais quelques palestiniens sont restés. Le soir j’ai appris avec effroi qu’un Palestinien a été grièvement blessé à balles réelles. Cela s’est passé quand tous les internationaux et photographes sont partis. Un Palestinien a filmé la scène mais elle ne sera pas montrée ailleurs que sur youtube. Donc pour recapituler ; les soldats ont tiré en premier contre une manifestation non-violente contre le Mur. Le but de la manifestation n’est pas d’attaquer les soldats mais d’exprimer un refus de la politique d’occupation et de colonisation. L’emploi de la force par les soldats israéliens contre des civils apparaît comme complètement disproportionnée. Les soldats ont utilisé des belles réelles et ont grièvement touché un Palestinien.

Demonstration in Bi'lin / Manifestation à Bil'in







(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org. Bil'in, 13 June 2008

Friday, June 13, 2008

Israeli Army Uses Live Rounds on Peace-13-06-2008

the Israeli army uses live ammunition against protestors in Bilin.
L'armée israélienne a utilisé des bqlles reelles contre les manifestants de Bilin et a blessé grievement un Palestinien.

'Jewish settler attack' on film

'Jewish settler attack' on film
By Tim Franks
BBC News, Jerusalem

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Footage of West Bank attack

Footage from a video camera handed out by an Israeli human rights group appears to show Jewish settlers beating up Palestinians in the West Bank.

An elderly shepherd, his wife and a nephew said they were attacked by four masked men for allowing their animals to graze near the settlement of Susia.

The rights group, B'Tselem, said the cameras were provided to enable Palestinians to get proof of attacks.

A spokesman for the Israeli police said that an investigation was under way.

So far, no-one has been arrested.

Baseball bats

For the past year, B'Tselem has handed out video cameras to Palestinians as part of its "Shooting Back" project.

The BBC has been given exclusive access to the footage of this particular attack, which happened earlier this week. The date and time on the camera footage shows that it is Sunday afternoon.

Over the brow of the hill walk four masked men holding baseball bats. To the right of the screen, in the foreground, stands a 58-year-old Palestinian woman.

Thamam al-Nawaja has been herding her goats close to the Jewish settlement of Susia, near Hebron in the southern West Bank.

Within a few seconds, she, along with her 70-year-old husband and one of her nephews, will be beaten up.

As the first blows land, the woman filming - the daughter-in-law of the elderly couple - drops the camera and runs for help.

'Ten-minute warning'

Mrs Nawaja spent three days in hospital after the attack.

Returning to the small Palestinian encampment close to the red-roofed houses of Susia, she stepped slowly and unsteadily out of the minibus.

They don't want us to stay on our land, but we won't leave - we'll die here
Thamam al-Nawaja

A dark stain showed through the white gauze covering her broken right arm. Her veil was lifted gingerly away from her lined face. A bloodshot eye and intersection of scars revealed a fractured left cheek.

"The settlers gave us a 10-minute warning to clear off from the land," she told me, her voice a tired, cracked whisper.

She and her husband had stood their ground. It is at this point that her voice grows louder.

"They don't want us to stay on our land. But we won't leave. We'll die here. It's ours," she added.

Indeed, the rest of the world regards Jewish settlements in the West Bank such as Susia, as illegal, built on occupied territory.

Those settlements have been a large part of the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis for the last 41 years. The daily confrontation is not often caught on camera. That, now, is beginning to change.

Video proof

The attack near Susia was filmed with one of 100 video cameras that B'Tselem has handed out to Palestinians in the region.

When they have the camera, they have proof that something happened - they now have something they can work with, to use as a weapon
Oren Yakobovich
B'Tselem

The thinking behind the project is that when trouble flares, rather than just giving a statement to the Israeli police or army, video carries much more weight.

"The difference is amazing," says Oren Yakobovich, who leads the Shooting Back project.

"When they have the camera, they have proof that something happened. They now have something they can work with, to use as a weapon."

We asked a spokesman from the Susia settlement for a comment on Sunday's incident. He declined.

Inside one of the tents belonging to the Palestinians living near Susia, we watched the footage of the aftermath of the attack - the victims slumped by the roadside, bloodied, waiting for an ambulance.

The bright, wide eyes of the children shone with the light of the small television screen.

Violence against Jews as well as Palestinians has long scarred this place. Video may now may be giving us a new and raw view.

But for most people here, the only answer - a political deal - remains out of sight.
Story from BBC NEWS:

See the video at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/middle_east/7451691.stm

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Witness: What I Saw: Israel Telling Lies about Bil'in

What I Saw: Israel Telling Lies about Bil'in
author Wednesday June 11, 2008 09:28author by Kim Bullimore - palestinechronicle.com

Once again, the Israeli military lied to its citizens and the rest of the world. In an article published June 6 on YNet, the online version of the Israeli mass daily Yedioth Ahronoth, the Israeli military claimed that it was justified in attacking an anti-wall and anti-occupation demonstration, in which an Irish Nobel Peace Laureate and the Vice President of the European Parliament participated, because demonstration participants were "rioting" and "throwing stones" at the Israeli military [1].

In the YNet article about the weekly non-violent demonstration against the apartheid wall and the illegal Israeli occupation in Bil'in village located near Ramallah in the Occupied West Bank, the Israeli military claimed that "about 70 Palestinians and left-wing activists took part in the protest and hurled stones at security forces, who used crowd dispersal means in response". They went on to state that the IDF "regretted the fact that 'week after week large numbers of security forces need to deal with Israeli rioters, who turned public disturbances into a regular occurrence'.

As a non-violent and peaceful participant in this demonstration, I completely dispute these claims made by the Israeli military. For the past three years Bil'in village has become a model for non-violent demonstrations against the wall and Israeli occupation. This week's demonstration took place at the end of the 3rd annual international non-violent and grass roots resistance conference held by the village. The conference which went for three days attracted well over 150 participants, the great majority from around the world. It also had the support from across the Palestinian political spectrum, including the Palestinian Authority.

At the conclusion of the conference and prior to the weekly demonstration, a friendly football (soccer) game was held about half a kilometre from the wall. The match was between teams made up of Bil'in residents, Israeli anti-occupation activists and international solidarity supporters. While the match was taking place, a few Palestinian teenagers from the village approached the wall but they did not throw stones. From the other side of the illegal apartheid fence, Israeli soldiers were stationed on a hill and they immediately began firing tear gas at the children. The football match came to a quick end as the wind carried the teargas across the field, causing some players and spectators, including an elderly Palestinian man, to collapse.

The conference participants who were at the football match regrouped under a tree. Shortly, we were joined by many of the residents of the village who at the end of Friday prayers, marched to the football field. The villagers were joined by around 30 Israeli anti-occupation activists.

More than 200 people, not 70 as the Israeli occupation forces claim, took part in the peaceful, non-violent demonstration. We marched from the football field, down the wadi (valley) to the illegal barrier. The Israeli Occupation Forces were stationed approximately 50 metres away, behind concrete barriers on the opposite side of the road, behind the illegal apartheid fence. We stood standing and clapping peacefully. As we stood there, the conference declaration, which highlighted the necessity for non-violent struggle against the illegal Israeli occupation was read out.

Participating in the non-violent, peaceful demonstration were the Vice President of the European Parliament, Luisa Morgantini and Irish Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Mairead Corrigan-Maguire, as well as a delegation of Italian law makers, along with delegations from France and other European countries. While there were a considerable number of young people in attendance, in reality the great majority, who were from the various international delegations, were aged between 45 and 60 years. Throughout the demonstration, we - the demonstrators - repeatedly held our hands up in the air - palms open - towards the soldiers, who could clearly see us, to show we were unarmed and peaceful. No-one from the crowd threw stones at the soldiers, no-one was armed and there was absolutely no threat to the Israeli military by our presence. However, despite this, the Israeli military opened fire, directly into the non-violent and peaceful crowd, with no warning.

Under Israeli law and under Israeli military regulations, Israeli soldiers are not allowed to fire directly at or into crowds who pose no threat to their safety. According to Israeli military regulations, a solider must only use a weapon in the event of immediate "danger to life," and when it is impossible to effectively defend one's self from the assailant other than by the use of the weapon.

In 2000, a report issued by the Israeli based Physician for Human Rights (PHR) revealed, however, that the Israeli military consistently violate Israeli law and their own regulations on a regular basis. According to PHR, the Israeli military use "live ammunition and rubber bullets excessively and inappropriately to control demonstrators, and that based on the high number of documented injuries to the head and thighs, the soldiers appear to be shooting to inflict harm, rather then solely in defense". The PHR's analysis of fatal gunshot wounds also revealed that approximately 50% of them were to the head, revealing that the Israeli military were specifically aiming at people's heads. In addition, they also noted that there were numerous head and eye injuries as a result of "rubber and rubber coated steel projectiles" [ie. rubber coated steel bullets] which revealed the "frequent misuse of these weapons, such as firing at a range of less then 40 metres at the upper part of the body". As a result, PHR noted that the events on the ground showed that the Israeli military not only violated their own regulations but it was "allowing soldiers to fire when they were not acting solely in self defense" [2]

Over the past four years, during my various stays in the Occupied West Bank, I have regularly witnessed the Israeli military open fire on and into crowds of unarmed, peaceful demonstrators. At the last Bil'in demonstration that I attended approximately four weeks ago in May, the Israeli military also opened fire directly into the peaceful, non-violent demonstration. At this demonstration, however, they were also using rubber coated steel bullets and live ammunition. Although I have been in demonstrations in the Occupied Palestinian Territories where rubber bullets and live ammunition has been fired at the crowd before, this was the first time I had ammunition fired directly towards me.

In 2004, at a peaceful, non-violent demonstration in the village of Budrus, against the apartheid wall, I was hit with a teargas canister fired by the Israeli military from a distance of around 150 metres. At the time, myself and others, were attempting to lift a young Israeli woman, who was an amputee with a prosthetic leg, into an ambulance. She was injured when she attempted to protect a group of young Palestinian girls, who the Israeli military opened fire on. The young Palestinian girls had simply been clapping and chanting slogans against the wall.

As we lifted the Israeli activist into the ambulance, I was hit in the upper thigh by a super-heated teargas canister traveling at high velocity. Despite wearing jeans, I suffered burn scars and intensive and deep bruising, which was around 30 centimetres in diameter. For more than a week after being hit by the canister my entire body was in acute pain, as it went into shock from being hit with such intensity. At the time, I was extremely grateful that I was not hit in the head by the canister.

Today, however, myself and my IWPS team mate, just avoided being hit by super-heated, high velocity teargas canisters being fired directly into the crowd at chest and head level by the Israeli military. One canister went whizzing by me like a missile and hit in the head an older European man who was about 4 metres in front of me. I saw the teargas canister hit him in the head and his hands fly to his head in order to protect himself. I later found out that the man was the Italian judge, Julio Toscano, mentioned in the Ynet article. Other non-violent demonstrators were also hit.

As people started to regroup and move back to try and aid those who were injured by the Israeli military's barrage, soldiers once again began firing into the unarmed and peaceful crowd. Again teargas canisters went whizzing by me at chest and head level. My team mate was hit in the back. Luckily she was wearing her back pack which took the intensity of the hit. The bag, made of nylon, however, was visibly damaged and melted due to the impact of the canister.

What took place in Bil'in village on June 6 was no riot. It was once again a peaceful non-violent demonstration. And once again, the Israeli military opened fire on unarmed, non-violent demonstrators, violating not only Israeli law but also the Israeli military's own operational regulations. In order to justify their brutality and illegal behaviour, the Israeli military lied to its own citizens and the rest of the world.

-Kim Bullimore is currently living the Occupied West Bank, where she is a human rights volunteer with the International Women's Peace Service (www.iwps.info). She has a blog www.livefromoccupiedpalestine.blogspot.com and is a regular writer on Palestine-Israel issues. She contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.

category ramallah | non-violent action | opinion/analysis
IMEMC NEWS http://www.imemc.org

Monday, June 09, 2008

IDF attacks on photographers / Attaques de l'armée israélienne contre les photographes



(c) Activestills/ Injury caused to an Activestills photographer by IDF during a demonstration against the construction of the Wall, Nilin, 8 June 2008
Blessure causée par l'armée israélienne contre un photographe de Activestills pendant une manifestation contre le Mur à Nilin, 8 Juin 2008


One of the photographers from activestills was injured during a demonstration in Nihilin on 8/06/2008. No stones was thrown at that stage. The soldiers suddenly threw tear gas at the crowed who was only 20 meters away.
Last month also a lens of one of us was destroyed by a rubber bullet, another one was also beaten up by the police during a commemoration event of the Nakba in Israel.


Un des photographes de activestills a été bléssé durant une manifestation contre le Mur. A ce stade, aucune pierre n'avait été lancée. Les soldats israéliens ont soudainement lancé des gaz lacrimogènes contre la foule qui n'etait qu'à une vingtaine de mètres.
Le mois dernier un autre photographe de activestills a perdu son objectif, touché par une balle en caoutchouc. Une autre photograhe a été aussi battue par la police israélienne pendant un événement organisé en Israël commémorant la Nakba.

Saturday, June 07, 2008

Another Day of non violent resistance in Palestine/ Un autre jour de resistance non violente en Palestine







(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org, Oush Grab, Beit Sahour, 6 June 2006.

Playing Bingo
A Bingo party was organised in Oush Grab where a IDF military based has been abandonned. Since the last three weeks, the settlers have been trying to take the site to build a new settlement. The site is located on the lands of Beit Sahour. Some activities have been organised in order to prevent the settlers to take over. That day the settlers did not come.

Une partie de Bingo a été organisée sur le site de Oush Grab où une base militaire israélienne a été abandonnée et risque d'être prise par les colons qui ont essayé de s'y établir à plusieurs reprises les trois dernieres semaines. Des Palestiniens et internationaux organisent regulierement des activités afin que les colons ne prennent pas la place qui appartient à la municipalité de Beit Sahour. Ce jour là les colons ne sont pas venus.

Another Day of non violent resistance in Palestine/ Un autre jour de resistance non violente en Palestine




(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org. Al Khader, 6 June 2008

Palestinians pray on the road during a peaceful demonstration in the village of Al Khader. With the construction of the Wall, the village is losing most of his lands. Many houses have also recently receive house demolition orders

Les habitants de Al Khader protestent en prayant sur la route. Le Mur a des consequences catastrophiques pour le village qui va perdre la plupart de ses terres tandis que plusieurs batiments ont recemment reçu des avis de demolitions.

Another Day of non violent resistance in Palestine/ Un autre jour de resistance non violente en Palestine





(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org. Nilin, 6 June 2006.

see text below/ voir texte ci dessous

Another Day of non violent resistance in Palestine/ Un autre jour de resistance non violente en Palestine







(c) Anne Paq/ Activestills.org. Nilin, 6 June 2008.

300 Palestinians from Nilin together with Israeli and international activists protest against the wall, the occupation and the settlements.
Israel is currently building the Wall that will take more than 2500 dunams from the village lands.
The people of Nilin decided to make a noise protest” in front of the Hashmonaim settlement, to remind the settlers that they live on a stolen land and that the Walll is a land grab.
The private security forces of the settlement shoot live ammunition, towards the protestors and army forces threw tear gas and invaded the village injuring 5 protestors.

Protestation dans le village de Nilin contre la construction du Mur et des colonies.
Envrion 300 palestiniens, internationaux et Israeliens se sont dirigés vers la colonies de Hashmonaim en faisant du bruit pour rappeler aux colons qu'ils vivent sur des terres prises aux Palestiniens. Les gardes de securité ont utilisé des balles réelles contre les manifestants, l'armée est arrivée et a lancé des gza lacrimogènes et a envahi le village.